Ethereum Classic logo

Ethereum Classic (ETC) price and market data

ETCRank #62
$6.92$0.00000000 (+0.00%)7d
Loading chart...

Vicalis market state

CALM

Held for Jun 26, 2026, 12:05 AM

Volatility: Low

Trading activity
Vicalis summary

Volatility is low. Trading activity is low. There are no signs of elevated market stress.

The confirmed signal is recalculated daily from volatility and market activity.

ETC Markets

Loading markets...

Coin profile

What You Need to Know About Ethereum Classic (ETC)

Ethereum Classic (ETC)

Ethereum Classic (ETC) is an independent smart-contract blockchain that continued Ethereum's original history after the controversial reversal of the effects of The DAO hack. The network retained compatibility with the Ethereum Virtual Machine but, unlike today's Ethereum, uses Proof of Work: miners produce blocks and receive ETC, while the coin itself pays for gas. The ECIP-1017 monetary policy provides for successive reductions in the block reward and a theoretical upper limit on issuance, so ETC should be assessed both as fuel for an EVM network and as an asset whose security depends on the market for computing power. The split was not caused by an incompatible contract language, but by different decisions about whether the ledger state after The DAO should be changed. Familiar EVM addresses, bytecode, and tooling do not create a shared ledger or the same consensus model. As the block subsidy declines, slower dilution comes with greater dependence on fees and a sufficiently robust hashrate market, so the issuance cap cannot be assessed separately from miner economics.

What it is used for

ETC is used for transfers, deploying and calling Solidity contracts, paying for computation, and rewarding miners. Practical demand is best assessed through the number of meaningful transactions and active contracts, the availability of wallets, RPC services, oracles, and stablecoins, as well as the hashrate and distribution of mining pools. EVM compatibility makes code easier to port, but it does not automatically bring Ethereum's liquidity or external infrastructure with it. To measure demand for actual network service, exchange transfers should be distinguished from state-changing application activity such as deployments, contract calls, and settlement through live services. Ported Solidity code becomes economically relevant only when ETC users also have working interfaces, price feeds, and liquidity within this network. Fees generated by that activity supplement the block reward; as ECIP-1017 reduces the subsidy, they matter more to miner revenue and to the link between network use and security.

What can move the price

  • growth in genuine use of EVM applications and transfers on Ethereum Classic, which increases ETC spent on gas and makes the network useful beyond exchange trading
  • changes in hashrate, miner distribution, and mining economics: a more expensive attack strengthens confidence in settlement, while an outflow of computing power increases the risk premium the market requires
  • the predictable reward reductions under ECIP-1017, which slow new ETC issuance but also reduce miner revenue and therefore need to be considered alongside demand for block space and fees

Key risks

  • a PoW network is vulnerable to reorganizations if enough hashrate is concentrated or rented; Ethereum Classic has already experienced majority attacks, so exchanges and bridges may require more confirmations
  • the ecosystem of applications, oracles, stablecoins, and developers is considerably narrower than Ethereum's, meaning code compatibility does not guarantee comparable demand or liquidity
  • reward reductions, hardware and electricity costs, pool concentration, and possible restrictions on mining can weaken the economics that protect the network

What makes it different

The closest comparison is Ethereum: both networks come from the same codebase and use EVM tooling, but ETC preserved the unaltered history after The DAO, Proof of Work, and a declining issuance schedule with an upper limit. This makes ETC a rare PoW version of a public EVM network, although principled immutability and a familiar stack do not automatically compensate for its smaller application ecosystem and security scale. The distinction is operational as well as philosophical. Holding ETC alone does not make an account a validator: block ordering is supplied by miners, their hardware and electricity, and the distribution of hashrate. EVM compatibility provides familiar languages and tools, but each application must independently build users, oracle coverage, stablecoin support, and liquidity on Ethereum Classic. ETC holders are therefore directly exposed to whether a smaller PoW economy can continuously fund the computing power needed to defend its chosen history.

Market Statistics

Market Cap$1.09B
24h Volume$28.89M
Circulating Supply157,606,069.42
Total Supply157,606,069.42
Max Supply210,700,000

What to check before using Ethereum Classic

A coin price is meaningful only in context: liquidity, trading volume, volatility, market capitalisation and the venues where the asset actually trades.